It turns out that William Kristol's smear piece in today's NYT is based in, well, some pretty blatant lies.
The Times has issued a correction on its website, but shouldn't Kristol have checked his facts before printing something so patently false?
Especially since he was, ya know, calling one of the major presidential contenders a liar . . .
Just asking.
Should there be a tax on corporate income at all. For and against.
-
That is a reader request. I used to think the ideal tax rate on
corporations should be zero, but that is no longer my view. For one thing,
too many ind...
6 hours ago
1 comment:
Not just Kristol, but wouldn't one of his editors (or his assistants) be able to do the fact-checking?
Kristol seems to consistently give his detractors ammunition.
Post a Comment