It turns out that William Kristol's smear piece in today's NYT is based in, well, some pretty blatant lies.
The Times has issued a correction on its website, but shouldn't Kristol have checked his facts before printing something so patently false?
Especially since he was, ya know, calling one of the major presidential contenders a liar . . .
Just asking.
AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is
rated more favorably
-
That is the title of a new paper in Nature, here is part of the abstract:
We conducted two experiments with non-expert poetry readers and found that
part...
8 hours ago
1 comment:
Not just Kristol, but wouldn't one of his editors (or his assistants) be able to do the fact-checking?
Kristol seems to consistently give his detractors ammunition.
Post a Comment