It turns out that William Kristol's smear piece in today's NYT is based in, well, some pretty blatant lies.
The Times has issued a correction on its website, but shouldn't Kristol have checked his facts before printing something so patently false?
Especially since he was, ya know, calling one of the major presidential contenders a liar . . .
Just asking.
More on Sir Thomas Gresham (from my email)
-
…Double-entry book-keeping – John and I believe, with some evidence, that
he may well have been the person to bring double-entry book-keeping to the
UK f...
1 hour ago
1 comment:
Not just Kristol, but wouldn't one of his editors (or his assistants) be able to do the fact-checking?
Kristol seems to consistently give his detractors ammunition.
Post a Comment