It turns out that William Kristol's smear piece in today's NYT is based in, well, some pretty blatant lies.
The Times has issued a correction on its website, but shouldn't Kristol have checked his facts before printing something so patently false?
Especially since he was, ya know, calling one of the major presidential contenders a liar . . .
Just asking.
Tariff sentences to ponder
-
We find that only 15.1 percent of the decline in goods-sector employment
from 1992 to 2012 stems from U.S. trade deficits; most of the decline is
due to ...
1 hour ago
1 comment:
Not just Kristol, but wouldn't one of his editors (or his assistants) be able to do the fact-checking?
Kristol seems to consistently give his detractors ammunition.
Post a Comment